Maryland House Bill HB996

Maryland 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/10/23
• Refer: 2/10/23

Caption

Artificial Intelligence - Implementation Causing Injury or Death - Civil and Criminal Liability

Impact

The bill impacts both civil and criminal law. It establishes provisions under the existing articles of Judicial Proceedings and Criminal Law, explicitly relating to personal injuries or deaths caused by AI implementations. Under the civil provisions, those liable may face penalties not exceeding established limitations on non-economic damages, thus introducing a noteworthy consequence for negligence in the design of AI. On the criminal side, the legislation outlines that using AI-directed implements to cause injury or death can result in penalties equivalent to the maximum for similar direct offenses, effectively treating AI’s role in such events seriously within the legal framework.

Summary

House Bill 996 sets forth new legal frameworks concerning artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. It outlines that individuals or entities who intentionally design and create AI software that has the capacity to cause injury or death will be held strictly liable for any damages stemming from its use. This statute marks a significant shift towards accountability in the rapidly developing field of AI, ensuring that developers can be held responsible for the consequences of their creations. The bill seeks to establish accountability measures that address the growing concerns around safety and ethical use of AI systems in society.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the implications of holding developers accountable for actions taken through their AI systems. Discussions around the bill likely reflect broader societal concerns over the autonomy of AI and the ethical responsibilities of its designers. Some may argue that strict liability could stifle innovation in AI development due to fear of financial repercussions, while others may advocate that such oversight is necessary to ensure public safety. The balance between encouraging technological advancement and protecting individuals from potential harm caused by AI remains a critical focal point of debate within this legislation.