Pennsylvania House Bill HB1917

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/12/23
• Refer: 12/12/23

Caption

In general provisions relating to Commonwealth Procurement Code, further providing for definitions and providing for prioritization of American-made supplies.

Impact

The implementation of HB1917 could significantly influence state laws concerning procurement by mandating that state agencies prioritize acquiring goods and services from within the United States. This change is expected to promote job growth in the manufacturing sector while potentially increasing costs for certain products due to a reduced reliance on cheaper foreign imports. However, supporters argue that the long-term benefits of bolstered domestic industries could outweigh initial economic drawbacks.

Summary

House Bill 1917 seeks to amend the Commonwealth Procurement Code by emphasizing the need for prioritization of American-made supplies in government procurement processes. This bill aims to enhance support for domestic manufacturing and ensure that public funds are utilized to promote local businesses, thereby stimulating the economy. By mandating that procurement practices favor American-made products, the bill reflects a broader trend towards ensuring national economic resilience and independence.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB1917 appears to be generally positive among proponents who view it as a necessary step towards economic recovery and manufacturing revival. Advocates argue that prioritizing American-made products fosters national pride and economic stability. Conversely, critics express concerns about potential increases in costs for taxpayers and the feasibility of sourcing sufficient quantities of American-made goods to meet procurement demands.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB1917 include debates over the practicality of enforcing such prioritization, the potential rise in government procurement costs, and whether the bill's implementation could inadvertently limit competition. Opponents highlight the importance of maintaining a diverse supply chain that includes international vendors, arguing that such diversity is crucial for keeping prices competitive and ensuring that quality standards are met.