Establishes provisions for the appointment and duties of commissioners to attend an Article V convention
Impact
The enactment of HB 823 would significantly influence state laws by clarifying the mechanisms through which states can propose amendments to the Constitution. It formalizes the process for appointing representatives and delineating their authority, thus impacting how state legislatures engage with federal constitutional processes. By establishing clear guidelines, the bill helps ensure that the state is prepared to participate meaningfully in any future Article V convention, potentially leading to profound implications for state-federal relations.
Summary
House Bill 823 establishes provisions for the appointment and duties of commissioners who will attend an Article V convention. This convention is convened to discuss potential amendments to the United States Constitution, an action that has garnered attention in state legislative circles. The bill aims to outline the responsibilities of these commissioners, emphasizing the importance of their roles in representing state interests at the national level. This includes ensuring that the voices and concerns of the state are appropriately addressed during discussions on constitutional amendments.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 823 has been generally positive among proponents who view it as a necessary step towards active state participation in constitutional discussions. Advocates argue that by equipping the state with a structured approach to appointing commissioners, the bill empowers local governance and promotes civic engagement. However, there are also voices of caution among opponents who express concern over the implications of pursuing an Article V convention, fearing the risks of unintended consequences or radical changes to the Constitution.
Contention
Notable points of contention regarding HB 823 include debates on the appropriateness of convening an Article V convention and the potential for resulting changes to the Constitution. Critics argue that the risks associated with such a convention—where anything from minor amendments to sweeping changes could be proposed—outweigh the benefits of state representation. Conversely, supporters assert that the lack of a structured approach has left states unprepared to leverage their legislative authority in constitutional matters. The balance between proactive engagement and caution in constitutional reform remains a central theme of the discussion.
Establishes a legislative commission on article V conventions of the states to represent the state of New York at article V conventions; provides penalties for commissioners who exceed their scope of authority and individuals who interfere with the duties of a commissioner.
Establishes a legislative commission on article V conventions of the states to represent the state of New York at article V conventions; provides penalties for commissioners who exceed their scope of authority and individuals who interfere with the duties of a commissioner.