Pennsylvania House Bill HB2108

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/14/24
• Refer: 3/14/24
• Refer: 6/24/24
• Report Pass: 6/27/24
• Engrossed: 6/27/24
• Refer: 6/30/24

Caption

In preliminary provisions, further providing for definitions; and, in Pennsylvania Game Commission, further providing for organization of commission, providing for prohibition and further providing for accountability.

Impact

The proposed changes in HB 2108 are expected to streamline the operational practices of the Pennsylvania Game Commission by emphasizing accountability and ethical standards. Amendments also call for the implementation of policies to foster a better relationship with the public and those holding licenses with the Commission. The introduction of an ethics policy ensures that Commission members understand their obligations under state law, thereby enhancing the Commission's credibility and public trust.

Summary

House Bill 2108 aims to amend Title 34 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, which pertains to the organization and functioning of the Pennsylvania Game Commission. The bill introduces new definitions relevant to lobbying, with a specific focus on ensuring that the Commission does not engage with lobbyists or lobbying firms. This is intended to enhance the integrity of the Commission's decision-making process and prevent external influence. The bill further prescribes the composition of the Game Commission, mandating that at least one member possess expertise in wildlife management and is actively involved in agricultural operations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2108 is generally positive, particularly among those who advocate for increased transparency and accountability in governmental agencies. Supporters view the prohibition on lobbying as a significant step toward safeguarding the Commission from potential conflicts of interest and undue external pressure. However, there may be concerns from some quarters about the implications of limited engagement with outside expertise, as the effectiveness of the Commission could be potentially hampered by a lack of diverse viewpoints.

Contention

One notable point of contention revolves around the balance between ensuring accountability and maintaining an effective, knowledgeable commission. While the bill seeks to preclude the influence of lobbying, critics may argue that this could inhibit critical interactions that could enhance the Commission’s function. Additionally, there may be discussions on how these regulations might affect the recruitment and retention of qualified individuals willing to serve on the Commission, given the restrictions imposed by the legislation.