West Virginia Senate Bill SB213

West Virginia 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/13/23
• Refer: 1/13/23
• Refer: 2/10/23

Caption

Relating to responsibility for reimbursement of training cost of law-enforcement employees who leave original jurisdiction

Impact

The proposed legislation aims to ensure that law enforcement agencies do not incur financial losses for training their employees if those employees decide to move to another agency shortly after completing their training. This can potentially enhance employee retention by providing financial accountability for leaving employees who wish to take advantage of training opportunities without the intention to remain with their current agency. The reimbursement process is designed to minimize the burdens on law enforcement agencies, especially smaller departments with limited budgets.

Summary

Senate Bill 213 addresses the responsibility for reimbursement of training costs incurred by law-enforcement agencies in West Virginia when employees leave their original employment to join another agency within the state. The bill mandates that the new jurisdiction of the employee must reimburse their previous employer for any training costs, including wages, benefits, tuition, and other expenses, paid to the departing law enforcement person. This reimbursement is to be made on a pro-rata basis over a period of two years.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 213 is likely to be positive among law enforcement agencies, particularly those that have faced challenges with attrition and funding for training. Supporters believe that this bill will incentivize employees to remain with their agencies longer after receiving costly training. However, there could be mixed feelings from employees themselves, as the requirement to repay training costs may act as a deterrent for those seeking better career opportunities elsewhere.

Contention

Notable points of contention could arise around the enforceability of the reimbursement agreements and the financial implications for both employees and agencies. Critics may argue that such provisions could limit an employee's freedom of movement and that enforcing repayment could lead to strained relationships between law enforcement agencies and their workforce. There might also be concerns about how this bill interacts with existing laws regarding employment and labor rights in West Virginia.