Maryland Senate Bill SB341

Maryland 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/12/24
• Refer: 1/12/24
• Report Pass: 2/5/24
• Engrossed: 2/8/24
• Refer: 2/12/24
• Report Pass: 3/25/24
• Enrolled: 3/28/24
• Chaptered: 4/9/24
• Passed: 4/9/24

Caption

Commission on African American History and Culture - Museum Name Change

Impact

This bill has implications for the statutes governing the operation and recognition of institutions dedicated to African American history in Maryland. By formally changing the name of the museum, it not only seeks to improve public awareness but also to attract potential funding and resources, thereby reinforcing the state's commitment to preserving and promoting African American heritage. Additionally, it positions the museum to better serve an educational role in the community by aligning its narrative with more celebrated historical figures.

Summary

Senate Bill 341 focuses on the Commission on African American History and Culture, specifically altering the name of a museum they operate. The proposed change is aimed at renaming the current Banneker-Douglass Museum to the Banneker-Douglass-Tubman Museum, which would better reflect the broader scope of African American history and culture represented. This bill seeks to enhance the museum's profile and ensure that it acknowledges the contributions of additional significant historical figures such as Harriet Tubman.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB341 appears largely supportive, with legislators acknowledging the importance of recognizing significant figures within African American history. The unanimous voting outcome, with 139 yeas and no nays during its third reading, reflects broad consensus among lawmakers. Advocacy groups and community leaders likely view the name change as a positive step towards inclusivity and representation in cultural education.

Contention

There is little contention surrounding this bill, as its purpose is straightforward and fundamentally about representation rather than policy enforcement. The potential challenges could arise from budgeting concerns, as the museum might require additional resources to implement the new identity effectively. However, there are no indications of substantial opposition to the actual renaming or its implications within the provided discussions.