Missouri Senate Bill SB687

Missouri 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/28/23
• Refer: 4/6/23

Caption

Modifies provisions relating to jury instructions for the offense of murder in the first degree

Impact

With the enactment of SB 687, there would be significant changes in the legal handling of first degree murder cases. Specifically, it outlines how trials should proceed in the event a defendant is found guilty. A two-stage trial process is established, where the first phase determines guilt, and only if the defendant is guilty does the second phase address punishment. This separation aims to minimize preconceived notions about punishment affecting the jury's judgment in the guilt phase of trials, potentially leading to fairer verdicts for defendants.

Summary

Senate Bill 687 aims to modify jury instructions related to first degree murder cases in Missouri. The bill proposes that if a murder in the first degree is charged but the death penalty is waived, the trial will proceed in the same way as other criminal cases. This shift is designed to streamline the legal process and clarify the responsibilities of the jury during trials for such serious offenses. The bill attempts to balance the legal proceedings surrounding murder cases, ensuring that juries are instructed properly on their duties at different stages of the trial.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 687 appears to be mixed among lawmakers and advocacy groups. Supporters argue that the revised jury instructions will eliminate confusion and provide clearer guidelines, enhancing the fairness of trials for defendants accused of severe crimes such as first degree murder. However, there are concerns about potential implications for how trials are conducted, particularly regarding the role of juries and their decision-making responsibilities. Critics may view these changes as simplifying complex legal issues in a way that could unintentionally minimize the severity of the crimes being adjudicated.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB 687 include the implications of establishing two distinct phases for trials involving the death penalty. Some legal experts worry that this separation may strip juries of crucial context when deliberating on guilt versus punishment. Additionally, the bill addresses the treatment of defendants deemed intellectually disabled, which could stir debates about broader notions of justice and fairness in the penal system. The introduction of such parameters reflects ongoing discussions about how best to reform the justice system in alignment with modern standards of equity.