If passed, S1017 would officially reclassify a state holiday, thus amending Section 25-1-1 of the General Laws of Rhode Island. The bill outlines that Rhode Island is unique in its observance of Victory Day, the only state in the U.S. that celebrates this holiday specifically linked to WWII. The rebranding to Peace and Remembrance Day reflects an effort to both honor military veterans while also recognizing the impact of war on civilians, aligning the state’s observances more closely with a comprehensive view of military history.
Summary
The bill S1017, introduced in the Rhode Island General Assembly, aims to change the name of the holiday celebrated on the second Monday of August from 'Victory Day' to 'Peace and Remembrance Day.' This change is rooted in a desire to acknowledge the complex historical narrative behind military victories, particularly in relation to World War II. The bill recognized that the observance of Victory Day may perpetuate a glorification of military triumph while overshadowing the civilian suffering that often accompanies war. By rebranding the holiday, the lawmakers intend to convey a commitment to peace and remembrance of those affected by conflict.
Contention
There are significant points of contention surrounding the name change. Supporters argue that the new name aligns better with modern values centered on peace and acknowledgment of civilian suffering in wartime. Conversely, some may contend that changing the name from Victory Day undermines the acknowledgment of military achievements during WWII. It also raises discussions about how the remembering of military victories can inadvertently minimize the impact of those victories on civilians and the historical injustices faced by groups such as Japanese Americans during the war.
Legislative intent
The bill explicitly aims to foster peace and encourage remembrance of the human cost of war, challenging the traditional glorification of military successes. The bill articulates legislative intent to prompt conversations about the broader implications of war, including moral and ethical responsibilities, thus potentially reshaping state narratives surrounding military history.