Modifies the relief that can be granted by courts pursuant to the Missouri Human Rights Act
Impact
The proposed changes stand to significantly impact how cases of alleged discrimination are handled under Missouri law. By mandating a more expedient transition from administrative to judicial remedies, the bill aims to provide quicker access to justice. Additionally, the bill specifies limits on the damages that may be awarded in such cases based on the size of the employer, thereby introducing a tiered damages structure that could reduce the potential financial burden on smaller businesses while providing a clear framework for larger employers.
Summary
Senate Bill 701 seeks to amend the Missouri Human Rights Act by modifying the provisions regarding the relief available in civil actions for unlawful discriminatory practices. The bill proposes that if the Missouri Human Rights Commission does not complete its administrative proceedings within 180 days from the filing of a complaint, it must issue a letter granting the complainant the right to pursue a civil action against the accused party. This modification is intended to streamline processes for aggrieved individuals who may otherwise face extended delays before receiving a judicial remedy for alleged discrimination.
Sentiment
The sentiment around SB 701 appears to be mixed. Supporters argue that the bill will enhance the efficiency of the legal process related to discrimination claims, allowing individuals to seek justice without undue delay. Conversely, opponents may be concerned that the limits on damages for larger employers could undermine the deterrent effect of potential sanctions against discriminatory practices, leading to calls for more comprehensive protections for individuals pursuing claims.
Contention
Notable points of contention include the potential impacts on the commission's ability to manage complaints and the enforceability of the new tiered damage structure. Some stakeholders worry that reducing the potential awards in discrimination cases might lead to less accountability for larger employers, who could be incentivized to take fewer corrective actions. This bill represents a balancing act between the need for expedient resolution of discrimination claims and ensuring that individual rights are properly protected.