West Virginia Senate Bill SB312

West Virginia 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/20/23
• Refer: 1/20/23

Caption

Authorizing DEP to promulgate legislative rule relating to control of ozone season nitrogen oxides emissions

Impact

If enacted, this bill will empower the DEP to implement necessary regulations aimed at reducing nitrogen oxides emissions during the ozone season. Such regulations could lead to improved air quality across West Virginia, potentially resulting in better health outcomes for residents. The changes introduced through these rules may align state practices with national efforts to mitigate air pollution and ultimately support the statewide goal of enhancing environmental protection. There may also be economic implications for businesses impacted by stricter emissions standards, necessitating an adjustment period for compliance.

Summary

Senate Bill 312 aims to authorize the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) to promulgate a legislative rule concerning the control of ozone season nitrogen oxides emissions. This legislation is a response to environmental concerns regarding air quality, particularly during ozone season when emissions can significantly impact public health and the environment. By formalizing rules on emissions control, the bill seeks to ensure compliance with state and federal environmental standards while also addressing the health implications tied to poor air quality.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 312 appears to be broadly supportive among environmental advocates who view the bill as a critical step towards improving air quality. However, there may be concerns from industry stakeholders regarding the potential costs and operational impacts of the new regulations. The ongoing dialogue in legislative discussions likely reflects a balance between advancing public health objectives and minimizing economic burdens on businesses subject to the new rules.

Contention

Notably, contention around SB 312 may arise from differing views on the effectiveness and implementation of such regulations. Critics could argue that additional emissions controls could burden local businesses, especially those that are already compliant with existing regulations. As discussions proceed, advocates for the bill emphasize the necessity of robust air quality measures while opponents may push back on the pace and scope of regulatory changes, highlighting the tension between environmental goals and economic interests in the region.