Maryland Senate Bill SB388

Maryland 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/18/24
• Refer: 1/18/24

Caption

Prescription Drug Affordability Board - Authority for Upper Payment Limits and Funding (Lowering Prescription Drug Costs for All Marylanders Act of 2024)

Impact

The implications of SB388 are significant for healthcare financing in Maryland. By facilitating upper payment limits, the bill may reduce out-of-pocket costs for consumers, particularly among vulnerable populations reliant on state programs. Additionally, it aims to stabilize the market by preventing excessive pricing on essential medications. However, the bill's success hinges on effective oversight and implementation by the Board, which is responsible for monitoring prices and drug availability to prevent shortages.

Summary

Senate Bill 388, also known as the Lowering Prescription Drug Costs for All Marylanders Act of 2024, aims to empower the Prescription Drug Affordability Board with the authority to set upper payment limits on prescription drugs that are deemed to lead to affordability challenges. The bill introduces provisions that require the Board to monitor availability and establish a process for setting limits, ensuring that these measures do not apply to drugs on the federal shortage list. The legislation is designed to make medications more affordable, particularly for state or local government purchases, health benefit plans, and the Maryland State Medical Assistance Program.

Contention

While supporters argue that SB388 is a necessary step toward making healthcare more affordable for all Marylanders, opponents may raise concerns about the potential stifling effect on pharmaceutical innovation and the availability of newer medications. Stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies and healthcare providers, could see the regulation as an encroachment on market dynamics, prompting discussions about balancing cost-control measures with maintaining incentives for drug development. Overall, the bill represents a critical move towards addressing healthcare affordability but opens up a broader debate on regulation versus free market principles.