Maryland House Bill HB476

Maryland 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/22/24
• Refer: 1/22/24
• Report Pass: 3/5/24
• Engrossed: 3/8/24
• Refer: 3/11/24
• Report Pass: 3/29/24
• Enrolled: 4/4/24
• Chaptered: 5/16/24
• Passed: 5/16/24

Caption

Criminal Procedure - Forensic Genetic Genealogical DNA Analysis and Search - Applicability for Deceased and Missing Individuals

Impact

This legislation alters existing criminal procedure laws within Maryland by establishing exceptions for FGGS in the context of minors. By specifically allowing for FGGS to be utilized for identifying deceased or missing children, the bill seeks to improve the efficacy of investigations and foster better outcomes in cases involving young individuals. This change is anticipated to minimize legal hurdles that could delay the application of advanced genetic techniques in urgent cases.

Summary

House Bill 476 addresses the use of forensic genetic genealogical DNA analysis and search (FGGS) in Maryland, specifically focusing on cases involving individuals under the age of 18 who are either deceased or the subject of missing person reports. The bill proposes that FGGS procedures do not apply in these specific instances, thereby streamlining the identification process for vulnerable populations. The bill's enactment is intended to enhance the ability of law enforcement to locate missing minors and identify deceased children without the constraints typically associated with FGGS protocols.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 476 appears to be largely positive, particularly among law enforcement and child advocacy groups who support innovations in investigative techniques that can aid in resolving cases concerning minors. Advocates view the bill as a necessary measure to promote the safety and recovery of vulnerable individuals, emphasizing the importance of utilizing modern technology in critical child welfare scenarios. Overall, the discussions surrounding the bill suggest a consensus that timely identification and resolution in these sensitive cases are paramount.

Contention

While the bill enjoys favorable sentiment, some concerns may arise regarding privacy and ethical considerations linked to the use of genetic data, particularly as it relates to minors. Critics might express reservations about the implications of allowing broad access to genetic data for the sake of expediency, potentially voicing fears over how this could affect parents and their autonomy. Nevertheless, the primary focus remains on enhancing the outcomes for cases of missing and deceased children, with the bill advocating for the balance between effective law enforcement practices and ethical standards.