West Virginia Senate Bill SB272

West Virginia 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/18/23
• Refer: 1/18/23

Caption

Authorizing use of Reclamation of Abandoned and Dilapidated Properties Program Fund

Impact

The implementation of SB272 is anticipated to positively impact state laws concerning the handling of abandoned and flood-damaged properties. By expanding the eligibility criteria for funding under the Reclamation of Abandoned and Dilapidated Properties Program, the bill provides local governments with the necessary resources to effectively manage and demolish dangerous structures. This legislative change is expected to lead to safer environments within communities, enhanced property values, and opportunities for economic development through the eventual redevelopment of these sites.

Summary

Senate Bill 272 aims to address the ongoing issue of abandoned and dilapidated properties in West Virginia, specifically allowing the use of the Reclamation of Abandoned and Dilapidated Properties Program Fund for the demolition of structures damaged by flooding events. This bill seeks to aid municipalities and other local entities in their efforts to reclaim blighted properties, thereby improving community safety and aesthetics. By enabling access to state funds for demolition in cases where properties are ineligible for federal assistance, SB272 proposes to streamline local efforts in environmental remediation and redevelopment efforts after natural disasters.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB272 appears to be generally positive among local governments and community organizations that support the demolition and rehabilitation of hazardous properties. Advocates argue that the bill is a necessary response to the increasing number of dilapidated structures resulting from flooding and other environmental factors. However, discussions around funding allocations and prioritization of projects may lead to some contention among stakeholders concerning resource distribution and procedural implementation.

Contention

Despite the support for the bill, there may be concerns regarding its execution, particularly with respect to how funds will be disbursed and managed, and what criteria will be used to evaluate the properties selected for demolition. Critics could argue that the bill may place too much power in the hands of local governments without sufficient oversight or that it could lead to selective prioritization that overlooks certain communities in need. If enacted, the bill would necessitate careful consideration of local needs and transparency in the administration of the program to ensure equitable access to the designated funds.