Maryland 2024 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB617

Introduced
1/25/24  

Caption

State Information Technology - Prohibited Applications and Websites

Impact

If passed, HB 617 would amend the State Finance and Procurement laws of Maryland by introducing restrictions that affect the daily operations of state employees and contractors. It would necessitate the Department of Budget and Management, in collaboration with the Department of Information Technology, to create guidelines aimed at implementing these restrictions effectively. This has implications for how state resources and technology are managed, particularly concerning the accessibility of information and communication tools that can be critical for government operations.

Summary

House Bill 617 aims to regulate the use of specific applications and websites by employees or agents of the state government. Primarily, it prohibits the downloading or utilization of applications developed by companies such as Bytedance Ltd. (TikTok) and Tencent Holdings Ltd. (WeChat) on any state-owned information technology systems. This move is presented as a measure to enhance cybersecurity and protect sensitive data from potential foreign threats, given the national concerns surrounding these applications.

Conclusion

Overall, House Bill 617 represents a significant shift in how Maryland could manage its information technology resources, particularly in light of growing cybersecurity threats. It underscores a proactive stance in mitigating risks associated with foreign-developed applications, while sparking important discussions about data privacy, government transparency, and the implications of restricting access to popular digital platforms.

Contention

There may be points of contention surrounding this legislation, particularly regarding the balance between security and accessibility. While proponents argue that the bill protects against potential security risks associated with the use of these applications, detractors might raise concerns about the limitations it places on user flexibility and the ability to utilize widely-used applications that facilitate communication and information sharing. Additionally, the necessity for exceptions in law enforcement and national security activities could lead to debates over adequate oversight and the criteria for such usage.

Companion Bills

MD SB757

Crossfiled State Information Technology - Prohibited Applications and Websites

MD HB1141

Carry Over State Information Technology - Prohibited Applications and Websites

Previously Filed As

MD HB1141

State Information Technology - Prohibited Applications and Websites

MD SB192

Criminal Procedure - Facial Recognition Technology - Requirements, Procedures, and Prohibitions

MD HB223

Criminal Procedure - Facial Recognition Technology - Requirements, Procedures, and Prohibitions

MD SB583

Public Safety - Law Enforcement Agencies - Acquisition and Use of Surveillance Technology

MD HB1065

State and Local Cybersecurity - Revisions

MD SB868

State and Local Cybersecurity - Revisions

MD HB911

Maryland Clean Energy Center - Climate Technology Founder's Fund - Establishment

MD SB900

Maryland Clean Energy Center - Climate Technology Founder's Fund - Establishment

MD SB906

Economic Development - Industry 4.0 Technology Grant Program

MD HB622

Economic Development - Industry 4.0 Technology Grant Program

Similar Bills

CA AB650

Director of Technology: state baseline security controls.

CA AB475

Department of Technology.

US HB1664

Deploying American Blockchains Act of 2025

US HB6572

Deploying American Blockchains Act of 2023

CA AB1323

Alcoholic beverage control: tied-house exceptions.

US SB1492

Deploying American Blockchains Act of 2025

CA AB1576

Secretary of Government Operations: working group: technology.

CA SB21

Law enforcement agencies: surveillance: policies.