West Virginia House Bill HB2919

West Virginia 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/23
• Refer: 1/23/23

Caption

To ban adult-oriented stores from operating physical locations in West Virginia

Impact

The enactment of HB 2919 would significantly affect businesses categorized as sexually oriented, explicitly banning adult video stores and arcades from having a physical presence in West Virginia. The bill also allows local governments to develop additional regulations tailored to address specific community concerns regarding these establishments. Its proponents argue this approach will lead to safer neighborhoods by reducing opportunities for criminal activity often associated with adult entertainment venues, contributing to an overall uplift in local communities' safety.

Summary

House Bill 2919, known as the Sexually Oriented Businesses Regulation Act, aims to prohibit the operation of adult video stores and adult arcades across West Virginia. The bill seeks to amend the state's code by establishing a set of regulations regarding sexually oriented businesses. It provides legislative findings that claim a correlation between such businesses and higher incidences of crime, particularly sex-related crimes. By banning these establishments, the bill's authors intend to address public safety concerns and promote the general welfare of citizens in the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2919 appears largely supportive among its sponsors and their constituents, who view the prohibition on adult-oriented businesses as a public good. Supporters contend that the bill is essential for curbing crime and protecting community morals. However, there may be dissent from those who see this legislation as an infringement on personal freedoms and the rights of businesses, raising concerns about government overreach and the curtailing of economic activity.

Contention

Notable points of contention include discussions about the bill's implications for local autonomy, as it preempts local regulations concerning adult businesses. Critics may argue that while the intent is to protect community welfare, the ban limits local governments' abilities to decide what best fits their unique circumstances. This tension reflects a broader debate in legislative circles around the balance between state control and local governance, especially regarding moral and social issues.