New Jersey Assembly Bill A2242

New Jersey 2022-2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/7/22
• Refer: 2/7/22
• Report Pass: 3/10/22
• Engrossed: 10/27/22

Caption

Requires DOT, NJT, and DHS to study and implement transportation mobility and accessibility improvements for persons with autism and developmental disabilities.

Impact

The implementation of AB 2242 is expected to create significant changes in how transportation infrastructure is developed and managed in New Jersey. By standardizing accessibility features across public highways and transit systems, the bill aims to foster greater independence for individuals with autism and developmental disabilities, thus enhancing their participation in the community. In addition to operational practices, the legislation requires considerations of nationwide best practices, potentially setting New Jersey as a proactive state in terms of disability-friendly transport solutions.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2242 seeks to improve transportation mobility and accessibility for individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder and developmental disabilities. The bill mandates a collaborative review among the New Jersey Department of Transportation (DOT), New Jersey Transit Corporation (NJT), and the Department of Human Services (DHS) to assess current infrastructure design practices. Based on this review, the departments will adopt new and revised design standards aimed at allowing these individuals to travel independently and safely. Furthermore, the bill encourages local entities seeking funding to align with the standardized design practices adopted at the state level.

Contention

While AB 2242 is generally viewed positively for its focus on inclusivity, there may be concerns regarding funding and resource allocation for the studies and subsequent infrastructure modifications. Stakeholders may debate the effectiveness of implementing these changes within existing budgets and timelines. Additionally, the coordination among the DOT, NJT, and DHS and the responsiveness of local entities to adhere to these new standards may be an area of contention. Critics may express apprehensions about the adequacy of the proposed measures in sufficiently addressing the diverse needs of individuals with varying degrees of autism and developmental disabilities.