Land Use – Affordable Housing – Zoning Density and Permitting (Housing Expansion and Affordability Act of 2024)
This legislation significantly impacts local land use laws by mandating local jurisdictions to allow increased density for certain housing projects, particularly those funded by the state and located near rail stations. It limits the use of adequate public facilities laws to deny permits for state-funded affordable housing projects and requires a public health impact assessment for qualifying projects. Such measures aim to streamline the permitting process and facilitate the development of affordable housing, taking into account the state's objective of addressing housing shortages.
House Bill 538, also known as the Housing Expansion and Affordability Act of 2024, is designed to enhance affordable housing in Maryland through modifications to zoning density and permitting processes. The bill establishes the position of the Historic Property Revitalization Director within the Department of Housing and Community Development, tasked with overseeing various housing initiatives and maintaining inventories of state-owned historic properties. One of the primary objectives is to prevent local legislative bodies from prohibiting manufactured homes or modular dwellings in residential zones, thereby increasing housing options for residents.
The reception of HB 538 has been mixed among lawmakers and community stakeholders. Supporters view the bill as a crucial step toward tackling the affordable housing crisis and believe that it empowers localities to embrace innovative housing solutions. However, opponents voice concerns about the potential overreach of state authority, arguing that it undermines local control and may compromise community preferences in zoning and development decisions. This polarization highlights the ongoing debate about the balance between statewide housing initiatives and local governance.
Notable points of contention include the implications of limiting local jurisdiction power regarding zoning and the decision-making authority over housing developments. Critics argue that while the bill intends to accelerate housing availability, it could lead to inappropriate developments affecting the character of neighborhoods. Additionally, concerns regarding the adequacy of infrastructure to support increased density projects in local communities have also been raised, emphasizing the complex interplay between housing policies and community health and safety.