Tennessee House Bill HB1647

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/5/24
• Refer: 1/10/24
• Refer: 1/24/24
• Refer: 1/30/24
• Engrossed: 2/8/24
• Enrolled: 3/5/24
• Passed: 3/15/24
• Chaptered: 3/26/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 5, Chapter 12 and Title 9, relative to county budgeting.

Impact

The implementation of HB 1647 will have a direct impact on how county budgets are managed and amended across Tennessee. By requiring a majority vote from the respective governing bodies of departments or entities before any budget amendment requests are made, the bill reinforces accountability within local governmental units. This measure could potentially reduce the number of frivolous or unwarranted budget amendments, fostering a more disciplined approach to local budgeting processes. It may also enhance communication and collaboration among departments as they work together to ensure that proposed budget modifications are aligned with overall county priorities.

Summary

House Bill 1647, which aims to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 5, Chapter 12 and Title 9, addresses the procedural requirements for counties regarding budget amendments. The bill stipulates that any requests for amendments to the county budget by county departments or other entities after the budget's adoption must receive approval through a majority vote of the governing body of the department or entity before being submitted for consideration by the county legislative body. This change aims to establish clearer rules for the amendment process, ensuring that all amendments have a certain level of local governance backing before they are presented to the county legislative body.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1647 appears to be generally positive among legislative members who support stronger governance around budgetary processes. Advocates believe that the measures put forth in this bill will streamline and clarify the budgeting process, ultimately leading to better fiscal management. However, there may also be concerns among some legislators regarding the added layer of approval requirements, which could slow down the responsiveness of departments to emerging needs or opportunities that necessitate mid-year budget adjustments.

Contention

One notable aspect of contention surrounding HB 1647 might stem from differing views on local governance and bureaucratic efficiency. While supporters argue that requiring departmental vote approval for budget amendments fosters accountability and thorough review, critics might contend that it imposes undue bureaucratic obstacles that could delay necessary funding adjustments. The balance between maintaining local control and ensuring efficient fiscal management will likely be a key point of discussion as the bill moves forward.