AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 39, relative to firearm regulation by local governments.
Impact
The proposed legislation impacts state law by altering how firearm storage regulations can be applied at the local level. By establishing this provision, the bill intends to offer reassurance to firearm owners that they will not face civil liability if their firearms are stolen from their vehicles, provided they comply with relevant local ordinances. This could result in increased firearm ownership and potentially reduce the number of legal disputes stemming from firearm thefts in populated counties.
Summary
Senate Bill 1695 aims to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically Title 39, concerning firearm regulations by local governments. The bill introduces a provision allowing individuals to store firearms in unoccupied motor vehicles in counties with populations exceeding 98,800, according to the latest census. This is a significant shift, as it seeks to clarify the legality of storing firearms in vehicles, which may help alleviate concerns regarding theft and liability for gun owners in such populated areas.
Conclusion
In summary, SB1695 represents a notable shift in Tennessee's approach to firearm regulation, with specific provisions meant to safeguard gun owners from liability related to theft. Its failure in committee suggests that further discussions may be needed to address the concerns of both supporters and opponents regarding the implications of the bill on local governance and public safety.
Contention
The discussions around SB1695 have highlighted potential points of contention. Critics may argue that allowing firearms to be stored in vehicles could pose safety risks, as it might encourage theft and unauthorized access to firearms. The bill failed in the Senate Judiciary Committee with 2 yeas and 7 nays, indicating a lack of consensus on its implications for public safety and local governance. Supporters believe that the bill provides necessary protections for responsible gun owners, while opponents raise concerns about its possible consequences on community safety.