AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 43 and Title 44, relative to vaccines for use in animals.
Impact
The introduction of SB1760 is poised to significantly impact state laws regarding animal health and vaccination protocols. By requiring the Department of Agriculture to categorize vaccines into genetically-engineered and non-genetically-engineered segments, the bill aims to clarify vaccine options available to farmers and agricultural businesses. This legislative change is expected to promote informed decision-making among stakeholders in the agricultural sector, potentially enhancing livestock and poultry health outcomes.
Summary
Senate Bill 1760 aims to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically in Title 43 and Title 44, to enhance the regulation and transparency of animal vaccines used in livestock and poultry. The bill mandates that the Tennessee Department of Agriculture maintains a publicly accessible website listing all vaccines approved for animal use within the state. This list must be updated regularly to reflect new vaccine approvals and the removal of those that are no longer authorized.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB1760 appears to be generally supportive, particularly among stakeholders involved in agriculture. Proponents argue that transparency in vaccine approvals and categories will enrich animal health practices and welfare. However, there may be concerns associated with the regulation of genetically-engineered vaccines, which could provoke discussions about agricultural ethics and consumer safety, although such sentiments were not deeply expressed in the majority discussions captured in the documentation.
Contention
One notable point of contention that may arise around SB1760 is the classification of vaccines into genetically-engineered and non-genetically-engineered categories. This distinction could lead to debates on agricultural practices and the implications of using genetically-engineered vaccines in animal husbandry. The bill’s implementation will require effective communication strategies to educate the agricultural community on the significance of these classifications, which could impact vaccine acceptance and usage in livestock and poultry health management.