Amending Joint Rules of Senate and House of Delegates
The impact of SCR7 on state laws will primarily manifest through changes in legislative processes regarding transportation infrastructure naming. By establishing strict timelines and procedures for these requests, the resolution will enhance accountability and predictability in legislative operations. This amendment is likely to minimize arbitrary naming decisions and provide a framework that ensures due process is adhered to when honoring individuals or groups through infrastructure naming.
SCR7 is a Senate Concurrent Resolution aimed at amending the joint rules of the West Virginia Senate and House of Delegates concerning the naming of transportation infrastructure. The bill specifies that requests for naming bridges and roads must follow a new procedural rule. Applications for naming must be submitted by a certain date each year, with responses from relevant divisions and introduction deadlines also clearly outlined. This structured approach is intended to streamline the process of naming infrastructure and ensure that applications are addressed timely and systematically.
The sentiment surrounding SCR7 appears generally supportive, as it aims to organize and clarify existing procedures. Proponents likely see it as a necessary modernization of legislative rules that could promote efficiency and order in the naming of public works. However, there may be some contention regarding the specific criteria and timelines established, as stakeholders with interests in infrastructure naming might have differing opinions on the inclusion and exclusion of applications based on these new rules.
Notable points of contention regarding SCR7 could involve how strictly the application process will be enforced, the potential for bureaucratic delays, and whether the timelines imposed adequately consider the public's input about infrastructure naming. Some legislators may feel that the new rules may restrict the flexibility needed to address urgent naming requests, while others argue that they provide necessary structure to a sometimes haphazard process. The resolution ultimately seeks to strike a balance between flexibility and order within legislative procedures.