JOINT RESOLUTION RESPECTFULLY REQUESTING THE EXECUTIVE CLIMATE CHANGE COORDINATING COUNCIL (EC4) TO PREPARE A REPORT ON BENCHMARKING AND BUILDING PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The bill is expected to have a significant impact on state laws regarding energy efficiency and climate change compliance. By establishing performance standards for large buildings, it seeks to enhance energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions associated with the building sector. The report produced by the EC4 will serve as a foundational document for potential future regulations and policies aimed at improving building performance. Moreover, the inclusion of public meetings and stakeholder input in the report drafting process suggests a commitment to transparency and community engagement in addressing climate challenges.
House Bill H7617 is a joint resolution requesting the Executive Climate Change Coordinating Council (EC4) to prepare a detailed report on benchmarking and building performance standards for large buildings in Rhode Island. The bill focuses on properties with a gross floor area of at least 25,000 square feet, both publicly and privately owned. The report aims to summarize the state's building sector emissions, identify properties subject to the new standards, as well as evaluate the energy sources used and the estimated costs for necessary retrofits to comply with these standards. Furthermore, it outlines the roles and responsibilities of state agencies involved in the development and implementation of these benchmarks.
The general sentiment surrounding H7617 appears to be supportive among environmental advocates, as it addresses long-term climate change goals and improvements in building efficiency. However, there are concerns raised by some stakeholders regarding the feasibility of implementing recommended changes, particularly the costs associated with retrofitting existing large buildings. While the bill promotes environmentally beneficial practices, it also emphasizes the need to consider economic implications for current building owners and the potential financial burdens that may arise.
Notable points of contention include discussions around the potential financial impacts on businesses and property owners required to meet the new performance standards. Critics may argue that the expenses related to compliance, such as retrofits and necessary amendments, could disproportionately affect smaller businesses or lower-income property owners. The timing and proposed timeline for implementing these standards are also likely to be debated, as stakeholders may call for a gradual implementation approach to better accommodate existing structures and financial capabilities.