Maryland 2024 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB1273

Introduced
2/8/24  
Refer
2/8/24  
Report Pass
3/12/24  
Engrossed
3/13/24  
Refer
3/14/24  
Report Pass
4/1/24  
Enrolled
4/4/24  
Chaptered
5/9/24  

Caption

Vehicle Laws - Manufacturers and Dealers - Delivery of Vehicles

Impact

If enacted, the bill will amend existing transportation laws by preventing manufacturers, distributors, and factory branches from refusing to deliver vehicles to licensed dealers in reasonable quantities and within a reasonable time. This change is expected to protect dealers' rights after they place orders based on advertised vehicle availability, thereby strengthening their bargaining power. The ongoing discussions around this bill suggest it is viewed as a step toward fairer practices within the automotive sales industry and aims to address long-standing issues about vehicle availability and distribution.

Summary

House Bill 1273 focuses on regulations concerning the delivery of vehicles by manufacturers and dealers in Maryland. The legislation establishes that certain requirements for vehicle manufacturers, distributors, and factory branches to deliver new vehicles apply once an electronic order is submitted or an allocation is accepted. The bill aims to streamline and clarify the responsibilities of manufacturers and dealers in vehicle sales, ensuring that dealers receive timely access to available vehicles, which is intended to enhance market efficiency and consumer access.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1273 appears to be generally positive among stakeholders in the automotive industry. Supporters argue that it promotes fairness and transparency in vehicle distribution, which is beneficial for both dealers and consumers. However, there may be some concerns regarding how these changes will be implemented and enforced, especially in the context of existing contractual relationships and market dynamics. Overall, the atmosphere indicates a consensus that improvements are needed in the current vehicle delivery framework.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill may include the implications it has for existing franchise agreements and how manufacturers might adapt their distribution strategies in light of the new obligations. Some manufacturers might express concern about the increased regulatory requirements and the potential for disputes over perceived failures to comply. The bill also prompts a discussion on how to maintain balance and fairness in the relationship between manufacturers and dealers without imposing overly burdensome regulations that could impact business operations.

Companion Bills

MD SB1003

Crossfiled Vehicle Laws - Manufacturers and Dealers - Delivery of Vehicles

Similar Bills

IL HB2956

LIQUOR-RETAILERS-TAP HANDLES

VA SB1308

Motor vehicle dealers; recall and warranty costs, right of first refusal.

VA HB1683

Motor vehicle dealers; recall and warranty costs, right of first refusal.

IN HB1236

Protections for motor vehicle dealers.

WV SB577

Clarifying prohibited practices by manufacturer, factory branch, distributor, or distributor branch when providing new motor vehicle to dealer

TX SB1917

Relating to motor vehicle franchised dealers and the reimbursement of motor vehicle franchised dealers by manufacturers and distributors for warranty, recall, over-the-air, and preparation and delivery work.

TX HB3859

Relating to motor vehicle franchised dealers and the reimbursement of motor vehicle franchised dealers by manufacturers and distributors for warranty, recall, over-the-air, and preparation and delivery work.

LA HB502

Provides relative to dealer warranty compensation