West Virginia Senate Bill SB90

West Virginia 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/10/24
• Refer: 1/10/24

Caption

Board of Medicine rule relating to licensure, practice requirements, disciplinary and complaint procedures, continuing education, and physician assistants

Impact

If enacted, SB90 will provide the Board of Medicine with clearer authority to regulate practice requirements and create uniform standards across the state for physician assistants. This is crucial for ensuring that there are consistent expectations for training and accountability within the profession. The amendments could streamline the process for addressing complaints and enforcing disciplinary measures, promoting greater professional integrity and patient safety.

Summary

Senate Bill 90 (SB90) proposes amendments to the West Virginia Code to empower the West Virginia Board of Medicine to establish legislative rules governing licensure, practice requirements, disciplinary actions, complaint processes, and continuing education for physician assistants. This bill is pertinent as it aligns with the updated needs of healthcare regulation and addresses modern practices in the medical field.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB90 appears to be generally positive among healthcare professionals, particularly those in or connected to the physician assistant field. Supporters emphasize the need for clearly defined regulations that match current healthcare practices, which can help improve the quality of care. However, there may be some apprehension among individuals wary of any additional regulations that could complicate existing processes or impose burdens on practitioners.

Contention

Most discussions around SB90 likely center on the balance between regulatory oversight and professional autonomy. While many support the bill for enhancing oversight and quality control, there may be concerns regarding the potential for over-regulation stifling the practice of physician assistants. Stakeholders could engage in debates about the appropriateness of the Board of Medicine's power in dictating continuing education requirements and the implications for current practitioners in the field.