Minnesota 2023-2024 Regular Session

Minnesota House Bill HF2856

Introduced
3/13/23  

Caption

Metropolitan Council's authority to take action or spend money on proposed guideways suspended.

Impact

If enacted, HF2856 will have immediate implications on transportation initiatives within several Minnesota counties, including Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington. By restricting the Metropolitan Council's ability to advance guideway projects, the bill could impact transit development timelines and funding allocations, thereby altering the landscape of local transportation planning efforts. The suspension aims to reevaluate existing transit priorities within the affected regions.

Summary

House File 2856 is legislation aimed at suspending the authority of the Metropolitan Council to take action or spend money on proposed guideways. This includes activities related to study, planning, preliminary engineering, final design, and construction. However, two key projects, the Gold Line bus rapid transit and the Green Line Extension light rail transit line, are exempt from this suspension. The bill is framed as a measure to temporarily halt certain transit initiatives in Minnesota until further developments occur, specifically until the Green Line Extension begins revenue operations.

Contention

The bill likely reflects different views within the legislature regarding transit needs and funding priorities. Supporters may argue that the suspension is necessary to reassess whether current plans align with community needs or fiscal realities, especially given past fiscal challenges experienced by the Metropolitan Council. Conversely, opponents might assert that halting these initiatives could deprive communities of essential transportation upgrades and investment, ultimately hindering economic development and complicating future planning.

Notable_points

HF2856 was introduced by multiple authors, indicating a collaborative effort to address concerns surrounding transit authorities and their decision-making power. As it is poised for discussion within the Transportation Finance and Policy Committee, it will be crucial to monitor the responses from different stakeholder groups, including local governments and community organizations, to gauge the broader implications of the bill's proposed actions.

Companion Bills

MN SF1764

Similar To Metropolitan Council's authority to take action or spend money on proposed guideways suspension

Previously Filed As

MN SF1764

Metropolitan Council's authority to take action or spend money on proposed guideways suspension

MN SF1345

Cost-benefit analysis requirement for proposed guideways

MN SF252

Cost-benefit analysis requirement for proposed guideways

MN HF1967

Cost-benefit analysis required for proposed guideways, and report required.

MN HF2199

Cost-benefit analysis for proposed guideways required, and report required.

MN SF4255

Metropolitan Council abolishment

MN HF1663

Metropolitan Council prohibited from issuing certificates of participation in certain situations, and host counties required to fund specified aspects of guideways.

MN HF2675

Metropolitan Council prohibited from issuing certificates of participation in certain situations, and host counties required to fund specified aspects of guideways.

MN SF1243

Metropolitan Council abolishment

MN HB527

Relating to requiring certain metropolitan rapid transit authorities to hold a referendum before spending any money for a fixed rail transit system.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.