Tennessee Senate Bill SB2128

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/29/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 7, Chapter 86, relative to reports of the emergency communications board.

Impact

The modification of reporting requirements introduced by SB2128 could hold significant implications for how the Emergency Communications Board manages its finances and audits its operations. By requiring detailed reporting on how much money is paid to the state and the state’s use of the 911 Emergency Communications Fund, the bill underscores the importance of providing clearer accountability to taxpayers and stakeholders relying on emergency services. This could potentially lead to adjustments in future appropriations and management of emergency funds, ensuring that resources are used more effectively.

Summary

Senate Bill 2128 aims to modify the reporting requirements for the Emergency Communications Board in Tennessee. Specifically, the bill mandates that the board include in its annual report details regarding amounts paid to the state from the 911 Emergency Communications Fund and any interest that has been diverted from this fund into the state's general revenue streams. This change is intended to enhance transparency and accountability regarding the use of funds allocated for emergency communications services.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB2128 seems to be positive, particularly among proponents of government transparency and accountability. Supporters argue that the bill strengthens oversight of critical funding sources and ensures that the public is informed about how emergency communication resources are being utilized. However, there may be some concerns from local officials about the possible bureaucratic implications or perceived restrictions on fund usage that might arise from increased reporting requirements.

Contention

A notable point of contention regarding SB2128 could revolve around the balance between necessary oversight and the administrative burden that may be imposed on the Emergency Communications Board. While advocates for accountability support the bill, some opponents might argue that the requirements could lead to redundancy or hinder the board's operational efficiency. Additionally, ongoing discussions may arise regarding what constitutes 'diversion' of funds and how such diversions could be interpreted in practice.