Tennessee House Bill HB2303

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/29/24
• Refer: 2/1/24
• Refer: 2/27/24
• Refer: 3/6/24
• Chaptered: 4/3/24
• Passed: 4/3/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 36, Chapter 3, relative to the issuance of marriage licenses.

Impact

The implementation of HB2303 would modify existing procedures and requirements around the issuance of marriage licenses in Tennessee. By formalizing the application process and mandating specific details to be included, the bill aims to streamline the process while ensuring that necessary information about the applicants is maintained. It reinforces the importance of legal documentation in the context of marriage, which may help in verifying the identities and intentions of applicants in a more structured manner.

Summary

House Bill 2303 aims to amend the Tennessee Code regarding the issuance of marriage licenses. Specifically, it requires that applicants for a marriage license submit a written application that includes their names, ages, current addresses, and social security numbers. For applicants under eighteen years of age, additional information regarding their parents or guardians must also be included. The bill stipulates that if either applicant is incarcerated or has a disability preventing their appearance, alternative submission methods through notarized statements are provided for them to apply for a marriage license.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB2303 appears mixed, with some lawmakers supporting the bill as a straightforward approach to improving the marriage licensing procedure by increasing transparency and accountability. Conversely, there could be concerns regarding the added bureaucratic steps it introduces for young or disabled applicants, which may be perceived as cumbersome or restrictive. The necessity of a notarized statement, for example, could raise accessibility issues for some individuals.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding the bill may arise from the requirements imposed on applicants, particularly those under the legal age of eighteen or those who are incapacitated. Opponents might argue that the notarization and additional documentation can pose barriers to individuals seeking to marry, echoing broader debates about personal freedoms versus regulatory frameworks in various areas of law. Additionally, there is potential for criticism about the impacts on the timeliness and accessibility of marriage licenses as individuals navigate these new procedural requirements.