New Jersey Senate Bill S2091

New Jersey 2022-2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/3/22
• Refer: 3/3/22

Caption

Requires certain utilities to allow residential customers to satisfy outstanding balances over time.

Impact

The implementation of S2091 is expected to have significant implications for state laws governing utility services, particularly in terms of consumer protection. By requiring utilities to create manageable payment plans for customers who have fallen behind on bills, the bill aims to prevent service discontinuation from becoming a cycle of financial hardship. This could potentially lead to decreased instances of homelessness and greater financial stability for families who depend on essential utilities. State law will need to adjust to incorporate these protections, ensuring that utilities comply with the new requirements set forth in the bill.

Summary

Senate Bill S2091, introduced in the New Jersey legislature, addresses the process by which public utilities can restore service to residential customers who have had their utility services discontinued due to nonpayment. The bill mandates that public utilities, including municipal public utilities and local public authorities, must allow customers to pay off any outstanding balances in a structured payment plan over a minimum of 12 months. Additionally, the bill stipulates that the amount due during the first six months of this payment plan must be lower than the amount due in the following months, easing the financial burden on customers in the immediate aftermath of service restoration.

Contention

While supporters argue that S2091 will provide necessary support for vulnerable populations, critics may express concerns about the financial implications for utility companies themselves. There could be fears that mandatory payment structures might strain utility resources or lead to disputes regarding the adequacy of payment plans offered. There may also be discussions surrounding the enforcement of the bill and ensuring that utilities adhere to these new payment guidelines without compromising their financial viability, which could be a point of contention among legislators and industry stakeholders.