Proposes constitutional amendment to eliminate judicial review of arbitration rulings in disputes between Judiciary and county concerning court facilities.
Impact
The proposed amendment specifies that once arbitration has taken place and a ruling is made, that decision will be final and binding, with no possibility of review by the Supreme Court. This significant change aims to clarify the authority and finality of arbitration decisions in these disputes, thereby potentially reducing prolonged legal processes regarding courthouse facility management. Supporters argue that it would promote fiscal accountability by preventing undue interference from the Judiciary in county financial matters.
Summary
SCR99 proposes an amendment to the New Jersey Constitution that seeks to eliminate judicial review over arbitration rulings in disputes between the Judiciary and county governments concerning court facilities. Currently, under New Jersey law, when a dispute arises about costs associated with courthouse facilities, it can be resolved through arbitration, but the Supreme Court has the authority to review and potentially alter the arbitrators' decisions. This can create a scenario where the Judiciary might effectively overturn a decision that affects its own operations.
Conclusion
Should SCR99 pass, it will be presented to the public in a general election for voting. The interpretative statement clarifies the implications of a 'yes' or 'no' vote, emphasizing the importance of the amendment in shaping future arbitrations involving courthouse facilities. This amendment seeks not only to streamline the process but also to fortify the role of counties in the financial aspects of court infrastructure.
Contention
Notably, the bill highlights a contention surrounding the balance of power between the Judiciary and county governments. Proponents believe that eliminating judicial oversight of arbitration will enhance local control and expedite resolutions concerning court facility disputes. However, critics may argue that this could undermine judicial checks and balances, raising concerns about the fairness and accountability of arbitration decisions, especially when the Judiciary is directly involved in these matters.
Same As
Proposes constitutional amendment to eliminate judicial review of arbitration rulings in disputes between Judiciary and county concerning court facilities.
Proposes constitutional amendment to eliminate judicial review of arbitration rulings in disputes between Judiciary and county concerning court facilities.
Proposes constitutional amendment to eliminate judicial review of arbitration rulings in disputes between Judiciary and county concerning court facilities.
Constitutional amendment to increase the non-lawyer membership of and provide for the selection judiciary commission members and to require investigations be conducted by directive of the supreme court. (2/3 - CA13s1(A)) (EN +$7,115 GF EX See Note)
Proposes constitutional amendment to eliminate judicial review of arbitration rulings in disputes between Judiciary and county concerning court facilities.
Proposes constitutional amendment to eliminate judicial review of arbitration rulings in disputes between Judiciary and county concerning court facilities.
Requests the Louisiana Supreme Court to take all action necessary to protect the importance of the judicial branch as a separate branch of government and the independence of the judiciary in performing powers and duties pursuant to the federal and state constitutions.