Illinois House Bill HB4205

Illinois 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/26/23
• Refer: 11/1/23
• Refer: 3/12/24

Caption

BOTTLE DEPOSIT ACT

Impact

The implementation of the Bottle Deposit Act would significantly affect both consumers and businesses in Illinois. Beverage sellers are required to participate in a system that includes proper labeling, compliance with deposit regulations, and arrangements for managing unclaimed deposits. The Act establishes penalties for violations and includes a comprehensive licensing framework for redemption centers, which will be overseen by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency. This can create new business opportunities in waste management and recycling services while ensuring that consumers have access to convenient return options for beverage containers.

Summary

House Bill 4205, also referred to as the Bottle Deposit Act, establishes a framework for a deposit and refund system on all beverage containers sold or offered for sale within the state of Illinois. The intent of this legislation is to promote container reuse and recycling by requiring consumers to pay an initial deposit on beverage containers, which can later be refunded upon the return of the container to designated redemption centers. The Act encompasses a wide range of beverage types, including soft drinks, water, and alcoholic beverages, ensuring these products contribute to the state's recycling efforts and waste reduction initiatives.

Contention

While the Bottle Deposit Act aims to enhance recycling efforts, it has faced criticism from various stakeholders. Some argue that the imposition of deposits may lead to higher prices for consumers or could burden smaller retailers and local businesses that may not have the infrastructure to handle deposit returns efficiently. Moreover, concerns have been raised regarding the potential operational challenges for redemption centers, including compliance costs and the enforcement of regulations against potential fraudulent behaviors associated with container returns. Discussions in legislative committees reflect a split between those advocating for environmental responsibility and those cautioning against unintended economic consequences.