Missouri Senate Bill SCR31

Missouri 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/7/24
• Refer: 2/8/24

Caption

Urges the Governor of Missouri to use all powers available to him to repel the invasion of all immigrants illegally present in this state to the nearest port of entry in the United States

Impact

If enacted, SCR31 may set a precedent for stronger state-level actions to address immigration enforcement, significantly influencing state laws related to law enforcement authority and public safety. By invoking the governor's power as commander-in-chief of the militia, the resolution highlights a shift towards a more proactive state stance on immigration control, potentially increasing militarized responses to migration issues. This move may also prompt legal challenges regarding the extent of state power versus federal immigration laws.

Summary

SCR31, a Senate Concurrent Resolution, urges the Governor of Missouri to utilize all powers available to repel the invasion of immigrants illegally present in the state, directing them to the nearest port of entry in the United States. The resolution is grounded in the constitutional principle that states retain the sovereign authority to self-defense in the face of invasion or imminent peril. Given the current climate regarding immigration, this resolution becomes particularly pertinent in light of increasing illegal entries, reported to be nearly one million in the most recent fiscal year, significantly elevating concerns related to crime and drug trafficking within the state.

Contention

The resolution is expected to spark contention surrounding its implications for local and state authorities, particularly regarding the militarization of law enforcement efforts in immigration matters. Proponents of SCR31 argue that the bill is necessary to protect public safety and welfare in light of rising crime rates associated with illegal immigration. However, opponents may view this approach as an overreach that could lead to civil rights violations and further strain community relations, prompting debates on the appropriate balance of power in the enforcement of immigration laws.