Tennessee Senate Bill SB2410

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/24
• Chaptered: 5/1/24
• Passed: 5/1/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 39 and Title 47, Chapter 18, relative to caller identification spoofing.

Impact

The enactment of SB2410 will significantly impact state laws regarding telecommunications services by making it an offense to knowingly transmit inaccurate caller identification information with the intent to defraud or cause harm. The bill imposes legal repercussions for individuals and service providers who engage in such deceptive practices, thus enhancing consumer protection measures. This aligns with broader efforts nationally to combat telemarketing fraud and improve the integrity of caller identification systems.

Summary

Senate Bill 2410 aims to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically focusing on caller identification spoofing. The bill introduces stricter regulations on the transmission of caller ID information to prevent individuals and businesses from misleading others, particularly in contexts involving debt collectors and telemarketers. Its primary objective is to protect consumers from fraud and potential harm that can arise from deceptive caller ID practices, which have been increasingly common in the telecommunications landscape.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding SB2410 appears to be favorable, particularly among consumer advocacy groups and legislators concerned with consumer rights. Supporters argue that this legislation is a necessary step towards mitigating fraud and ensuring transparency in telecommunications. However, there may also be concerns regarding the enforcement of such laws and the potential implications for legitimate businesses that use caller ID for marketing purposes, which could introduce points of contention.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise around defining what constitutes intentional defraudation, as well as the potential ramifications for businesses that utilize caller identification systems legally. Critics might highlight that while the bill is aimed at reducing fraud, it could inadvertently penalize legitimate practices within the telecommunications industry, potentially leading to overregulation. The balance between consumer protection and maintaining a fair operational environment for businesses will be crucial in the discussions surrounding the implementation of this legislation.