Tennessee House Bill HB2522

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/24
• Refer: 2/1/24
• Refer: 2/27/24
• Refer: 3/13/24
• Chaptered: 4/8/24
• Passed: 4/8/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 63, relative to osteopathic physicians.

Impact

The implications of HB2522 for state laws involve enhancing the regulatory framework governing osteopathic medical practice in Tennessee. By allowing the board to provide advisory letters, the bill seeks to improve communication and understanding between the regulatory authority and licensed professionals. This development may help reduce disputes and foster better compliance with existing regulations, thereby enhancing the overall quality of medical practice within the state.

Summary

House Bill 2522 aims to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically Title 63, to introduce provisions regarding osteopathic physicians. One significant change proposed by this bill is the authorization for the board to issue advisory private letter rulings to affected licensees. These rulings are directly related to matters within the board's jurisdiction and are meant to provide clarity and guidance to individual practice situations, although they would not have precedent-setting value for broader applications.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB2522 appears to be generally positive among legislators, as it has passed without opposition (94-0) during its recent voting session. Supporters likely view this legislation as a proactive step in fostering transparency and clarity for osteopathic physicians, thereby enhancing their ability to operate within the regulatory framework. The absence of dissenting votes suggests a consensus on the need for these regulatory improvements.

Contention

Although there do not seem to be significant points of contention surrounding HB2522, the emphasis on advisory rulings does raise questions about regulatory authority and the potential for varying interpretations among different licensees. Stakeholders may discuss how these rulings could impact individual practice situations and whether they adequately address the diverse scenarios osteopathic physicians might encounter in their practice.