West Virginia Senate Bill SB28

West Virginia 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/10/24
• Refer: 1/10/24

Caption

Department of Health rule relating to WV Clearance for Access: registry and employment screening

Impact

The passage of SB28 would empower the Department of Health to enforce rules that could significantly affect hiring practices within organizations that require background checks and employee screenings. This move is aimed at standardizing the procedures for accessing criminal background information and other pertinent data regarding potential employees, thus seeking to streamline the process across different organizations while ensuring compliance with state regulations.

Summary

Senate Bill 28 aims to amend and reenact certain provisions of the West Virginia Code pertaining to the authorization of the Department of Health to develop a legislative rule regarding the West Virginia Clearance for Access, specifically focusing on registry and employment screening procedures. Introduced and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary on January 10, 2024, the bill allows for the promulgation of rules that enhance the state’s oversight and implementation of employee screening protocols necessary for ensuring public safety in various sectors, particularly those involving vulnerable populations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB28 appears to be generally supportive among legislative members and health officials who recognize the importance of having robust employee screening mechanisms in place. However, there may be concerns from various stakeholders regarding the implementation of these rules, particularly those from civil rights advocates who may view increased screening as a potential barrier for certain individuals seeking employment.

Contention

While the bill seems to receive bipartisan support for addressing public safety through improved employee screening, there could also be contention related to the balance between necessary public health safeguards and the potential for overreach in privacy rights. Critics may argue that overly stringent rules could hinder employment opportunities for marginalized groups, thus igniting a broader discussion on the impact of such legislation on workforce accessibility.