Creates provisions relating to the release of contaminants into public water systems or drinking water sources
Impact
The essence of SB1513 lies in its aim to significantly bolster the protections surrounding public water systems. It mandates that upon receiving a complaint about a contaminant release, the Department of Natural Resources must investigate and assess the potential risk to public health and the systemic response required to manage the issue. Additionally, the bill empowers the Department to request the Attorney General to take legal action against those responsible for contaminant releases. This legal avenue aims not only to hold offenders accountable but also to recover costs associated with remediation, thus safeguarding public resources and maintaining the integrity of drinking water.
Summary
Senate Bill 1513 seeks to enhance the regulatory framework governing the release of contaminants into public water systems and drinking water sources in Missouri. This legislation proposes to amend chapter 640 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri by introducing specific provisions aimed at ensuring that any release of contaminants is swiftly investigated and addressed by the Department of Natural Resources. The bill outlines the definitions of key terms such as 'contaminant' and 'public utility' and establishes the necessity for investigations into reported complaints of contaminant releases. The goal is to ensure that the safety of public drinking water is preserved and that swift action can be taken to mitigate risks to public health.
Contention
While proponents believe that SB1513 will provide necessary protections for public health by ensuring quick action on water contamination issues, there may be concerns regarding the economic implications for public utilities and the potential increase in regulatory burdens. The bill explicitly states that public utilities found responsible for contaminating water sources may not pass on related costs to their customers during rate-making proceedings, which could lead to debates about financial accountability and the implications for utility companies in the state. This aspect may raise concerns among utility providers about their operational sustainability in responding to potential legal actions and remediation efforts.