Tennessee House Bill HB2787

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/24
• Refer: 2/5/24
• Refer: 3/13/24
• Refer: 3/26/24
• Refer: 4/10/24
• Refer: 4/17/24
• Chaptered: 5/13/24
• Passed: 5/13/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 68, Chapter 120, relative to building codes.

Impact

The proposed changes herald a shift in state law that empowers local jurisdictions concerning building safety regulations. By allowing local governments the authority to amend such codes, HB 2787 responds to the diverse needs of communities that may experience different housing scenarios. This could lead to a greater variety in how building safety is approached across different localities, potentially improving housing adaptability and addressing unique local risks, particularly with regard to fire safety. However, this flexibility is balanced by minimum statewide requirements, ensuring a base level of safety is universally maintained.

Summary

House Bill 2787 aims to amend Title 68, Chapter 120 of the Tennessee Code Annotated concerning building codes. One of the bill's main provisions allows local governments to amend the adopted building codes specifically for three- and four-family dwellings. This provision seeks to provide more flexibility at the local level, enabling communities to tailor building regulations based on their specific needs and circumstances. The bill outlines that local governments must comply with certain conditions regarding fire safety standards, notably stipulating that the state fire marshal cannot mandate automatic fire sprinkler systems for smaller multi-family buildings that meet specific size and height parameters.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2787 appears largely supportive, particularly among local government officials and community advocates who favor giving municipalities greater control over their building regulations. The sentiment acknowledges the importance of addressing local concerns within construction and safety practices. However, there may be some contention among groups focused on uniformity and central oversight, who argue that loosening the regulations could lead to inconsistencies in safety standards, raising potential risks in less controlled environments.

Contention

One notable point of contention relates to the specific exemption of automatic fire sprinkler systems for certain buildings under this bill. While supporters may view this as an opportunity for local governments to impose reasonable regulations based on their assessments, critics warn that it may compromise fire safety in areas that could benefit from stricter regulations. The discussion around this provision reflects broader debates about the balance between local autonomy and state oversight, with differing opinions on the adequacy of safety standards that should be enforced at the local level.