Modifies provisions governing funding for higher education
Impact
If enacted, HB 2905 would require a concerted effort from the Missouri Department of Higher Education and Workforce Development alongside public institutions to create and implement this funding model. Moreover, for the fiscal year 2027-28 and subsequent years, public institutions would receive appropriations based solely on the approved funding model. This shift in funding approach could significantly change the way financial resources are allocated across higher education institutions in the state, potentially leading to variations in program support and operational viability based on institutional performance metrics.
Summary
House Bill 2905 aims to amend provisions related to funding for higher education within the state of Missouri. The bill mandates the development of a stable and sustainable funding model for public institutions of higher education, including four-year institutions, community colleges, and the State Technical College of Missouri. This model, which is based on a 2023 study, seeks to enhance the financial stability of educational institutions while also focusing on accountability and outcomes-based performance metrics that promote student success and efficient operations. The proposed model is designed to be straightforward and comprehensible for both institutions and stakeholders.
Sentiment
The general sentiment surrounding HB 2905 leans towards a cautious optimism among proponents who believe that a well-structured funding model could better align state resources with institutional performance and student outcomes. However, some concerns exist regarding the reliance on outcomes-based funding, which may inadvertently create inequities among institutions serving diverse populations and varying educational missions. Critics fear that such a model could prioritize funding for higher-performing programs at the expense of those that cater to at-risk or non-traditional students.
Contention
A notable point of contention is the performance component of the funding model and how it would be measured and applied. Critics argue that establishing strict performance metrics could disadvantage schools serving a higher proportion of disadvantaged students or those with unique challenges. Additionally, there may be concerns regarding the implementation timeline and whether institutions will be adequately prepared for the expected changes in funding allocation by the time the new model is operational. Ultimately, the success of HB 2905 will depend heavily on collaboration between lawmakers, educational institutions, and stakeholders in ensuring a comprehensive and fair approach to funding higher education.