Relating to the Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation posting booking photographs of an accused person
Impact
One of the significant impacts of this bill is that it limits the circumstances under which booking photographs can be released to the public. For instance, the release is only permitted if the individual is a fugitive, poses an imminent threat, or has been convicted of a crime. Moreover, it requires remove-for-pay websites to delete these booking photographs upon request from the individual, under certain conditions, such as acquittal or a charge being dismissed. This measure aims to safeguard individuals from the potential long-term repercussions of having their booking photographs publicly displayed on online platforms.
Summary
House Bill 4621 aims to amend the criminal procedure statutes in West Virginia, specifically relating to the public availability of booking photographs generated by the Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation. The bill establishes that such photographs are not public records and provides specific circumstances under which these images can be disseminated or made public. It also introduces provisions that protect both law enforcement agencies and the Division of Corrections from liability concerning the release of booking photographs, should such dissemination occur inadvertently or by mistake.
Sentiment
The sentiment around HB4621 appears to be a mix of support and concern. Proponents argue that the bill protects individuals' privacy rights and prevents the exploitation of their images, especially by for-profit websites that charge fees for removal. However, there are concerns regarding its implications for transparency and accountability in law enforcement. Some legislators worry that the bill might hinder public awareness of criminal activities and potentially protect individuals who should be held accountable.
Contention
Notable points of contention include the balance between public safety and individual privacy rights. Critics argue that limiting the release of booking photographs could impede the public's right to know about individuals who have been arrested, especially if they are accused of serious crimes. Additionally, there are worries that the exemption for fugitive cases could lead to misuse of discretion by law enforcement agencies. The discussion reflects a broader debate about the management and dissemination of arrest-related information, which can significantly affect public perception and safety.
To permit the limited use of juvenile records in grievance proceedings regarding employees of the Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation when such records prove relevant.
Relating to the publication, republication, or other dissemination of mug shots and other information regarding the involvement of an individual in the criminal justice system; increasing a civil penalty.
Relating to certain business entities engaged in the publication, republication, or other dissemination of mug shots and other information regarding the involvement of an individual in the criminal justice system; providing a civil penalty.
Arrest booking photographs; establishing procedures for removal of certain photographs from publication or dissemination under certain circumstances. Effective date.
Arrest booking photographs; establishing procedures for removal of certain photographs from publication or dissemination under certain circumstances. Effective date.
Arrest booking photographs; establishing procedures for removal of certain photographs from publication or dissemination under certain circumstances. Effective date.