West Virginia 2024 Regular Session

West Virginia House Bill HB4957

Introduced
1/22/24  

Caption

Relating generally to lobbying rules

Impact

The proposed amendments are believed to simplify the current rulemaking requirements for the Ethics Commission, removing administrative burdens associated with photographs and training fees for lobbyists. By requiring sponsors of grassroots campaigns to disclose specific information regarding their expenditures and contributors, the bill seeks to foster accountability in lobbying practices, which could lead to more informed public discourse regarding legislative actions and decisions.

Summary

House Bill 4957 aims to amend the regulations governing lobbying activities and the West Virginia Ethics Commission. The bill modifies existing definitions of lobbying, eliminates certain requirements for lobbyists, and mandates that sponsors of grassroots lobbying campaigns report detailed financial information when expenditures exceed $5,000. These changes are intended to streamline the lobbying process and enhance transparency in campaign financing, particularly with regard to grassroots efforts aimed at influencing legislation.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment around HB4957 appears mixed. Supporters, including certain legislators, argue that the bill provides necessary clarifications and adjustments to better reflect modern lobbying practices, thereby promoting transparency. However, critics raise concerns that loosening regulations may undermine efforts to monitor the influence of money in politics and may result in less oversight of lobbying activities, potentially leading to increased corruption or malfeasance.

Contention

Key points of contention include the balance between facilitating grassroots political engagement and ensuring adequate oversight of lobbying activities. Opponents of the bill worry that reducing regulatory requirements could hinder the ability of the Ethics Commission to manage the lobbying landscape effectively, potentially weakening the safeguards intended to prevent undue influence on legislative processes. The debate over HB4957 highlights ongoing tensions related to campaign finance reforms and the regulation of political advocacy.

Companion Bills

WV SB482

Similar To Relating to rule-making authority of Ethics Commission

Previously Filed As

WV HB3062

Relating to grass roots lobbying campaigns

WV HB2205

Prohibiting chairmen of state political parties during or up to one year after the termination of their employment as chairmen of those political parties from registering as lobbyists

WV SB508

Clarifying reporting and disclosure requirements for grassroots lobbying expenditures

WV HB3203

Relating generally to West Virginia Real Estate License Act

WV HB3502

Bifurcating the ethics commission

WV HB2527

Relating to revising the criminal code generally

WV HB3182

Relating generally to mental health treatment

WV HR1

Adoption of the House Rules

WV HB2072

Relating generally to forfeiture of contraband

WV HB3424

Relating generally to the West Virginia State Athletic Commission

Similar Bills

WV SB745

Strengthening and reforming lobbying requirements

WV SB736

Relating to publication of registered lobbyist information

CA AB2172

Political Reform Act of 1974: electronic filings.

CA AB902

Political Reform Act of 1974: Fair Political Practices Commission: regulations.

WV SB482

Relating to rule-making authority of Ethics Commission

WV HB2120

Relating to forms and disclosures to the Ethics Commission

CA AB84

Political Reform Act of 1974: political party committee disclosures.

WV SB479

Relating to forms and disclosures to Ethics Commission