Tennessee House Bill HB2963

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/24
• Refer: 2/5/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 39, Chapter 17, Part 13, relative to firearms.

Impact

If enacted, HB2963 would significantly alter Tennessee's firearms regulations, particularly concerning the classification of automatic firearms and the accessories that enable them to function in an automatic capacity. This change is designed to address growing concerns over gun violence and the accessibility of high-capacity firearms, as it seeks to establish stricter controls on devices that can modify weapons for more lethal use. The legislation is set to take effect on July 1, 2024, underscoring a proactive approach toward enhancing public safety in the context of firearm regulations.

Summary

House Bill 2963 aims to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated regarding firearms, specifically focusing on devices such as switches or auto sears that allow firearms to fire automatically without manual reloading. This legislation introduces new definitions and classifications related to these devices within the law, aimed at tightening the regulations surrounding semi-automatic and automatic weapons. The bill proposes that the act of possessing or using such devices would result in a Class E felony, impacting those who might convert firearms to shoot in a fully automatic mode.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB2963 is likely to be mixed, reflecting the broader national debate on gun control. Supporters of the bill may view it as a necessary measure to reduce gun violence and prevent the misuse of firearms, while opponents may argue it could infringe upon the rights of law-abiding gun owners. The emotional climate surrounding this issue suggests strong feelings on both sides, with advocates for gun control supporting the bill for its potential to restrict dangerous modifications, and gun rights activists likely opposing it for fears of overreach in firearm legislation.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB2963 include discussions on the nature of gun ownership rights versus the need for public safety measures. Critics may express concerns that this legislation could lead to more stringent regulations on law-abiding citizens, rather than effectively targeting criminal behavior involving firearms. Additionally, the classification of automatic weapons and the differentiation from semi-automatic versions may raise questions about practicality and enforcement. This tension highlights a significant debate on how best to balance individual rights with community safety in the context of firearm use.