Massachusetts House Bill H4844

Massachusetts 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 7/9/24
• Refer: 7/10/24
• Engrossed: 7/10/24
• Refer: 8/5/24

Caption

Providing protections for reproductive or gender-affirming care location information

Impact

The implementation of H4844 is expected to significantly augment existing privacy laws in Massachusetts, particularly by making the storage and sharing of sensitive location data subject to stringent regulations. Notably, covered entities, which include businesses and service providers, will be required to maintain transparency by providing individuals with a clear and concise location privacy policy outlining how their data might be used. The law further prohibits the sale or transfer of location data to third parties, ensuring that sensitive patient information remains confidential and safeguarded against potential misuse.

Summary

House Bill 4844 aims to establish robust privacy protections for individuals seeking reproductive or gender-affirming care in Massachusetts. The bill introduces a new chapter, Chapter 93M, into the General Laws, specifically addressing how 'reproductive or gender-affirming care location information' is handled. Under this law, certain entities are prohibited from collecting or processing individuals' location information related to such care without obtaining explicit consent. The emphasis is placed on individual autonomy and the necessity for clear, informed agreement from patients before any data can be gathered or processed.

Contention

Debates surrounding Bill H4844 have highlighted the balance between technological advancement and privacy rights. Proponents argue the necessity of such protections given increasing concerns over data privacy in the digital age, especially in light of rising restrictions on reproductive health care across various states. On the other hand, critics express concerns that the bill might hinder legitimate data processing activities by health care providers who need this information for service delivery and public safety purposes. The bill's stipulations on consent and the delineation of exceptions for law enforcement are particularly contentious, sparking discussions on the implications for emergency responses and public health oversight.