Tennessee Senate Bill SB2813

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/1/24
• Engrossed: 4/9/24
• Enrolled: 4/15/24
• Passed: 4/29/24
• Chaptered: 5/9/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 8, Chapter 44, relative to public meetings.

Impact

The implications of SB 2813 are significant for local governments in Tennessee. By changing the definition of what constitutes a meeting under the law, the bill helps to foster exchange and collaboration between local and state officials. Proponents argue that this will enhance transparency and communication about state matters affecting local jurisdictions, ultimately leading to more informed decision-making. However, it also requires that such gatherings must not allow circumvention of the public's right to know about legislative processes.

Summary

Senate Bill 2813 aims to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically in Title 8, Chapter 44, which governs public meetings. The bill introduces a provision that allows members of a local legislative body to meet with members of the state legislative delegation without it being classified as a formal meeting, provided that the purpose of the assembly is an informational exchange and not meant for deliberating public business. This change intends to clarify and facilitate communication between local and state officials while maintaining the integrity of open meeting laws.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 2813 appears to be largely supportive among stakeholders who see the potential for improved dialogue between local and state governments. However, there are concerns from some watchdogs and civic groups about the risk of excluding the public from these meetings. Critics worry that the provision could lead to less accountability and more behind-the-scenes dealings that might not be properly documented or scrutinized.

Contention

While SB 2813 has received broad support, it does highlight a notable contention regarding the balance between efficient governance and public transparency. The provision allowing meetings under the new guidelines could be viewed as a loophole that might inadvertently allow for less oversight of local and state interactions. As discussions continue, there may be calls for safeguards to ensure that the spirit of open meeting laws is maintained even with these proposed changes.