Tennessee House Bill HB2971

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/8/24
• Refer: 2/15/24
• Refer: 4/16/24
• Engrossed: 4/18/24
• Enrolled: 4/30/24
• Passed: 5/15/24
• Chaptered: 5/20/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 3; Title 4; Title 5; Title 6; Title 7; Title 8; Title 9; Title 10; Title 11; Title 12; Title 13; Title 16; Title 17; Title 18; Title 29; Title 33; Title 36; Title 37; Title 38; Title 39; Title 40; Title 41; Title 43; Title 44; Title 45; Title 47; Title 48; Title 49; Title 50; Title 53; Title 54; Title 55; Title 56; Title 57; Title 58; Title 59; Title 60; Title 61; Title 62; Title 63; Title 64; Title 65; Title 66; Title 67; Title 68; Title 69; Title 70 and Title 71, relative to statutory revisions required for implementation of the annual appropriations act.

Impact

The passage of HB 2971 is expected to have a significant impact on state laws by eliminating outdated and unnecessary provisions across numerous titles in the Tennessee Code. This move is designed to facilitate a smoother implementation of the appropriations act, which is critical for the state’s fiscal health and operational efficiency. Additionally, the revisions intended by this bill could lead to more effective expenditure of state resources, ultimately benefiting the public by improving services and governance processes.

Summary

House Bill 2971 seeks to amend multiple titles within the Tennessee Code Annotated to ensure necessary statutory revisions are made for the implementation of the annual appropriations act. The bill reflects a comprehensive approach to revising existing statutes, touching upon a wide range of areas including titles on budget management, state operation protocols, and administrative regulations. By streamlining these areas, the bill aims to enhance governmental efficiency and ensure that the state's laws are updated in alignment with budgetary priorities.

Sentiment

In the discussions surrounding HB 2971, the sentiment among legislators appeared largely supportive, particularly regarding the need for a clean and organized code that reflects contemporary governmental practices. Proponents emphasized the importance of maintaining an effective framework for managing state budgets, which received resounding agreement as a prior necessity. However, as with many legislative initiatives, there may be concerns among some community groups about how these changes could affect specific regulations and protections that are found within the existing code.

Contention

Notable points of contention have not prominently emerged in the discussions around HB 2971, primarily due to its technical nature focused on statutory compliance rather than controversy-laden policy choices. Nonetheless, any bill that revises extensive sections of existing law may naturally raise questions regarding the implications for individual rights and local governance. Transparency in how these revisions are executed will be crucial to address any potential dissent among stakeholders who may feel the changes could disrupt established legal frameworks or public policies.