Voters allowed to vote for "none of the above" in elections for governor, lieutenant governor, and legislative offices; and conforming changes made.
Impact
If enacted, HF3967 would amend various sections of the Minnesota Statutes, including provisions related to voting and elections. It seeks to require election judges to create a separate category for 'none of the above' votes, which would be prominently displayed on general and special election ballots. Additionally, the bill requires that if a majority of voters select NOTA in a gubernatorial or legislative election, no candidate will be declared elected to that office, essentially voiding the election outcome in those specific instances. This could potentially lead to higher accountability among candidates the next election cycle as they face the possibility of losing their position due to widespread disapproval.
Summary
House File 3967 (HF3967) introduces a significant change to the electoral process in Minnesota by allowing voters the option to vote for 'none of the above' (NOTA) on ballots for the offices of governor, lieutenant governor, and legislative positions. This option empowers voters who may feel disillusioned with the candidates running, enabling them to express dissatisfaction without abstaining from the vote entirely. By incorporating NOTA, the bill aims to enhance voter engagement and address concerns over candidate quality in contested elections.
Contention
Some lawmakers may contest this bill based on concerns about its practical implications on election outcomes and the messaging it sends about candidate viability. Critics could argue that this mechanism might complicate the election process or create a political climate of uncertainty, particularly in high-stakes races for governor and legislative seats where the stakes for candidate selection are already high. Proponents, on the other hand, view it as a necessary step towards democratic reform, enabling voters to actively reject unqualified candidates and prompting parties to take candidate selection seriously.
Ranked choice voting in elections for federal and state offices provided; Ranked Choice Voting Task Force established; jurisdictions authorized to adopt ranked choice voting for local offices; procedures established for adoption, implementation, and use of ranked choice voting; use of electronic voting systems with a reallocation feature allowed; report required; and money appropriated.
Ranked choice voting provided; jurisdictions allowed to adopt ranked choice voting for local offices; adoption, implementation, and use of ranked choice voting established; electronic voting systems with a reallocation feature allowed; and money appropriated.
People who register on election day required to cast provisional ballots, voters with challenged registration status required to cast provisional ballots, and technical and conforming changes made.
Election administration provisions modified, voter registration requirements modified, voting instruction and sample ballot requirements amended, tabulation process and equipment requirements amended, notification timeline provided to counties amended, and vacancy in nomination process amended.