Minnesota House Bill HF4971

Minnesota 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/14/24
• Refer: 3/14/24

Caption

Secretary of state required to place advisory questions on 2024 state general election ballot related to state flag and state seal designs adopted by State Emblems Redesign Commission.

Impact

If passed, HF4971 will not only gauge public sentiment regarding the redesigned state flag and seal but may also lead to significant changes in Minnesota's statutory framework governing state emblems. By repealing specific previous laws relating to the state flag and seal, the bill aims to clear the way for new designs to be adopted formally, contingent upon voter approval. This could have broader implications for how governmental decisions about state symbols are made in the future, potentially initiating a more participatory approach in state governance.

Summary

House File 4971, introduced by Representative Olson, mandates the Secretary of State to place advisory questions related to the state flag and seal designs on the 2024 state general election ballot. This bill arises from the recommendations of the State Emblems Redesign Commission, aiming to engage the public in the decision-making process concerning the official symbols of the state of Minnesota. The advisory referendum will allow voters to express their approval or disapproval of the proposed designs for both the state flag and seal, which have undergone redesign proposals in recent years.

Contention

The bill has ignited discussion regarding how state symbols reflect collective identity and heritage. Some advocates argue that a redesign can modernize the state's image and better reflect contemporary values, while critics may contend that the current flag and seal have historical significance that deserves preservation. Additionally, logistical concerns such as the costs associated with changing state emblems and adapting materials across state departments may also surface during legislative debates. The advisory nature of the referendum might be a point of contention, questioning whether public voting on such matters is the appropriate course of action.