Provides for protective orders to limit requests for access to government records in certain cases.
Impact
If enacted, A5615 could significantly alter the landscape of public records requests in New Jersey by empowering courts to restrict access under certain conditions. The bill is designed to ease the operational burdens on public agencies that struggle with an overwhelming volume of requests, thereby allowing for better management of resources and responses. However, this restriction could raise concerns about transparency and accountability, affecting how citizens engage with and access government information.
Summary
Assembly Bill A5615, introduced in New Jersey, provides for the issuance of protective orders by the courts to limit the number and scope of requests for access to government records. This bill aims to address issues where excessive requests have substantially disrupted the operations of public agencies and custodians. In cases where a verified petition demonstrates such disruption, the court may limit or eliminate the agency's duty to respond to future requests from the offending requestor.
Contention
One notable point of contention surrounding A5615 revolves around balancing the need for government efficiency with the public's right to access information. Supporters argue that the bill is necessary to prevent abuse of the records request process, while critics may view it as a measure that could limit transparency. There is apprehension that such protective orders could be misused to restrict legitimate inquiries into government conduct, potentially impeding the public's ability to hold officials accountable.
Relating to allowing a governmental body to redact certain personal information under the public information law without the necessity of requesting a decision from the attorney general and allowing information about a public officer or public employee to be withheld if disclosure would pose a substantial risk of physical harm.