Minnesota 2023-2024 Regular Session

Minnesota House Bill HF5298

Introduced
4/4/24  

Caption

Trespass law modified to allow purple markings.

Impact

The implementation of HF5298 will directly impact Minnesota's statutes governing trespassing and land use, specifically amending section 97B.001. By authorizing the use of purple markings in conjunction with traditional 'no trespassing' signage, the bill aims to simplify enforcement for landowners while providing clear legal backing for prohibiting unauthorized access. This could lead to a significant shift in how trespass laws are perceived and enforced across various types of properties, especially in agricultural and recreational contexts.

Summary

HF5298 seeks to modify existing trespass laws to include new provisions allowing property owners to use purple paint markings as a method of marking boundaries where entry is prohibited. This legislative change aims to provide a clearer and more straightforward way for landowners, including those managing public areas, to express their intent against trespassing on their property. Under the new provisions, the purple markings must comply with specific size and placement guidelines to ensure visibility and effectiveness in deterring outdoor recreation on private land.

Contention

While supporters of HF5298 argue that the bill will enhance landowner rights and provide a simple visual cue to signify prohibited access, critics may express concerns about the potential for confusion over the markings, particularly if improperly used or recognized by the public. Critics might also worry that the change could inadvertently hinder lawful access to recreational lands, such as for hunters retrieving wounded game, suggesting that while enforcing property rights is essential, it must be balanced with public access needs.

Final_notes

As discussions around HF5298 continue, the legislative process will likely explore balancing landowner interests with public rights to recreational access. Observing the bill's progression and any amendments introduced will be crucial for stakeholders involved in outdoor recreation and property management, as these dynamics shape Minnesota's legal framework surrounding land use.

Companion Bills

MN SF5414

Similar To Trespass law modification to allow purple markings

Previously Filed As

MN SF5414

Trespass law modification to allow purple markings

MN HF944

Trespass law modified to allow purple markings.

MN SF1875

Trespass law modification to allow purple markings provision

MN SF5208

Use of purple paint in lieu of signage prohibiting trespassing authorization

MN SF855

Trespass restrictions for outdoor recreation modification

MN HF1303

Use of purple paint in lieu of signage prohibiting trespassing authorized.

MN SF742

Use of purple paint authorization in lieu of signage prohibiting trespassing

MN SB0258

Enforcement of trespassing laws.

MN SB18

Provides relative to the use of purple paint in lieu of "no trespassing" signs. (8/1/18)

MN H0933

Trespassing

Similar Bills

CA AB516

Sex offenses: disabled victims.

CA AB2123

District-based elections.

CA AB453

District-based elections.

MI HB4122

Health occupations: health professionals; permanent revocation of license or registration if convicted of sexual conduct under pretext of medical treatment; provide for. Amends sec. 16226 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.16226). TIE BAR WITH: HB 4121'23

CA AB3171

Controlled substances: fentanyl.

CA AB892

Sex offenders: registration: solicitation of a minor.

MN SF1826

Payment rates establishment for certain substance use disorder treatment services

MN HF1994

Payment rates established for certain substance use disorder treatment services, and vendor eligibility recodified for payments from the behavioral health fund.