New Jersey Assembly Bill AR89

New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/24
• Refer: 1/9/24

Caption

Urges Congress and Department of Veterans Affairs not to reduce funding for ambulance services for veterans.

Impact

The implications of AR89 extend beyond individual veterans; reducing federal reimbursements would likely shift the financial burden to state and local governments, which may not have the resources or infrastructure to handle such responsibilities effectively. This could lead to a deterioration of ambulance services in areas with significant veteran populations, especially in rural parts of the state where access to healthcare is already strained due to hospital closures and long distances to medical facilities. The average ambulance bill in New Jersey ranges from $400 to $600, which could become unaffordable for many veterans if reimbursements are diminished.

Summary

Assembly Resolution No. 89 (AR89) is a legislative proposal from the State of New Jersey that aims to urge Congress and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) not to reduce funding for ambulance services provided to veterans. The resolution recognizes the crucial role of these services for veterans, especially in light of potential cuts in funding that could adversely affect their access to necessary medical transportation. The proposed reductions in reimbursements put the health and well-being of approximately 338,012 veterans in New Jersey at risk, many of whom rely on these services for timely and critical medical care.

Contention

A crucial concern surrounding AR89 is the logistical and financial viability of maintaining adequate ambulance services without federal support. Advocates for the resolution argue that cutting reimbursements undermines the commitment to serve those who have served the nation, potentially leaving veterans without access to necessary care. Furthermore, there is apprehension that such budget cuts would compel ambulance companies to cease operations, especially in rural areas where they're already facing profitability challenges. This situation raises significant ethical and operational questions about the adequacy of care available to veterans and the societal obligation to ensure their health needs are met.