Utah Senate Bill SB0150

Utah 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/1/22
• Refer: 2/2/22
• Report Pass: 2/8/22
• Engrossed: 2/15/22
• Refer: 2/17/22
• Report Pass: 2/18/22
• Report Pass: 3/1/22
• Enrolled: 3/11/22
• Passed: 3/24/22

Caption

Criminal Justice Data Management Task Force

Impact

This bill impacts state laws by creating a structured body, the Criminal Justice Data Management Task Force, which will analyze and potentially reform the current systems for data management in the criminal justice space. The task force is tasked with reviewing existing data collection requirements and making recommendations for improved integration, standardization, and overall automation of these processes. It is expected to result in enhanced data sharing capabilities between agencies like the Department of Corrections, the Utah Attorney General's Office, and law enforcement agencies.

Summary

Senate Bill 150, also known as the Criminal Justice Data Management Task Force Bill, establishes a task force focused on improving the management and sharing of criminal justice data across various state agencies in Utah. The task force is designed to streamline the collection, storage, and accessibility of criminal justice information, ensuring greater compatibility between different record systems for improved efficiency and effectiveness in managing criminal justice operations.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 150 appears to be generally supportive, particularly among lawmakers who recognize the necessity for more efficient data management practices within the criminal justice system. Proponents view this bill as a proactive approach to addressing the challenges that arise from disjointed data systems and believe that the task force's efforts will lead to more informed policymaking and better resource allocation.

Contention

Notable points of contention may revolve around the implementation of recommendations made by the task force, such as concerns related to privacy and data security of individuals within the criminal justice system. There may also be discussions about the potential extensive costs associated with the automation and integration of records systems, necessitating careful consideration of the financial implications for the state's budget.