New Jersey Senate Bill S3247

New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/16/24
• Refer: 5/16/24

Caption

Establishes counseling program for eligible family members of active duty military members and disabled veterans.

Impact

This legislative effort is significant as it offers much-needed support to the families of military personnel who may experience unique stressors and mental health challenges related to their loved ones' service. By reimbursing mental health professionals for these sessions, the bill acknowledges the importance of addressing the mental well-being of those who support active duty service members and veterans. Moreover, it establishes a comprehensive statewide network of counselors, thereby creating a system that links appropriate mental health care providers with those in need. This can enhance the overall quality of support systems for military families within New Jersey.

Summary

Senate Bill S3247 aims to establish a counseling program specifically designed for eligible family members of active duty military personnel and disabled veterans. The bill mandates the Department of Military and Veterans' Affairs, in consultation with the Department of Human Services, to implement this initiative. The primary focus of the counseling program is to facilitate access to mental health care for family members by enabling qualified mental health professionals to offer up to ten counseling sessions per eligible family member each year, reimbursed by the state. These sessions can occur both in-person and through telehealth services, expanding accessibility for those who may face challenges in attending in-person appointments.

Contention

There may be points of contention regarding the implementation and funding of this counseling program. Concerns could arise surrounding the adequacy of mental health service providers willing to participate in the reimbursement program or the effectiveness of the outreach campaign mandated by the bill. Additionally, the potential requirement for administrative actions and regulations could be perceived as bureaucratic hurdles that may slow down the rollout of services. Stakeholders might advocate for more robust measures to ensure funding stability and adequate therapist availability, which, if neglected, could undermine the program's intended benefits.